the vma’s–what???

Reader Note: This is not my usual post. But as I sit here, poised to go to bed before 8pm because I stayed up late Sunday night watching the MTV Video Music Awards (VMA’s), I feel I’d be remiss if I didn’t say something. So I shall… 

Nonsense and ridiculousness.

Anyone who wants to waste several hours of their life that they will never get back.

0 (I won’t waste a bookmark icon.)

I LOVE award shows. When the ‘real’ award’s season rolls around I get giddy. The SAG Awards. The Golden Globes (my personal fave). The Grammys. All of course culminating in the Oscars. So while the prestige for the VMAs isn’t nearly as high, historically, they’ve been fun to watch. Until, Sunday…

I invested 2 hours (which wasn’t even the whole show). In retrospect, I have no idea why. Let us begin.

I love Alicia Keys but I’m at a loss as to what her bird’s nest of a hairdo and no make-up look were really trying to convey. It’s an award’s show, make an effort.

Kanye’s 4 minute monologue was so convoluted, I’m not entirely sure if he was ‘medicated’ or not; but clearly, he was just as confused as everyone else about what he was saying–because he made no sense. At all.

Key and Peele are supposed to be funny, so I hear. And I have no idea who the Nicole chick was backstage. What I do want to know is why they were all yelling? You have a mic. I’m watching on tv. I have my own volume button. There’s no need to yell at me. Plus, I have no idea what any of you are talking about so yelling isn’t going to make it any clearer.

Why Rhianna appeared four times, I don’t know. But I’m convinced that the 2nd performance was just her and her extended entourage dancing on stage. At least the majority of her songs I could understand; Future on the other hand, not so much. If you begged me to recite one word of what he sang last night, I wouldn’t be able to help you out.

The one. And only. Saving grace. For the entire painful experience. You guessed it. One word. Beyoncé. She is everything for a reason.

Which brings me to my final observation–Britney. Her performance was hyped as her return to the VMAs. That’s fine. But she performed after Bey. No one should ever perform after Beyoncé. Let’s be clear, if Bey is performing at a show, just let her close it out. It’s not fair to anyone to have to follow her, it’s just not. Beyoncé had fire, smoke, wind (she may have even had snow and rain), a costume change, and about 500 back up dancers. Britney had 2 side-kicks, banana yellow thigh high boots, and a rapper no one knew. Sorry Britney, I apologize on behalf of MTV.

difficulty level:
Impossible. Just Google Beyoncé’s performance and get some rest. I did the time so no one else has to suffer. You’re welcome.

TV Marketing Ploys–Do They Work?

4.1.1There aren’t many shows that I stay up-to-date on. Actually, there are 3 to be exact: The Following, Scandal, and Criminal Minds. I could go on and on about my love for each show–and actually did about Scandal in an earlier post, but that’s not why we’re here today… Speaking of Scandal…

As far as I know, and from everything I see on Twitter and Facebook–Scandal has been received incredibly well by viewers–men and women alike. (Ok, men are primarily watching because Kerri Washington is beautiful, but whatever…) The show is really good. The writing is awesome. The cast is great. The storylines keep you guessing and coming back for more, week after week…even when there are many weeks in between new episodes–which brings me to this question: Why the delay?

Scandal has had three new episodes in the last 3 weeks and viewers will now have to wait three more weeks before they find out what happens next. This isn’t the first 3-week hiatus Scandal has had, prior to the 3 new episodes it had been a month, a full 4-weeks in between new episodes. Now, I pose the question, is ABC doing this intentionally to keep viewers intrigued? Or, do they have severe scheduling conflicts? Or, are they trying to drag things out until sweeps and/or the end of the season? And above all, is it working?

I am an avid viewer–again, it’s one of the 3 shows I’m committed to, but I do find this frustrating. And as a marketer, I have to wonder if the scheduling is indeed a ploy. However, other than viewer frustration, what is it accomplishing? I am accustomed, as we all are, to a rerun every now and again. But when it becomes weeks, don’t you run the risk of people losing interest? Becoming fed up? Or, in the world of On Demand, Netflix, Hulu, and most networks offering their shows for free online–why not just wait until the season is over and then catch up all at once without the agony and nonsense of waiting weeks to find out what’s going to happen. It’s almost as though ABC is trying to create a cliffhanger–every week. (On some level, they’re succeeding.)

For now, it seems all of the people I know are hanging in there with the show, myself included. Maybe ABC is an absolute genius in how it’s approaching this. After all, Scandal achieved its highest Nielsen ratings with the March 21st episode–after the 1 month break. Personally, I think this is a gamble. There are some pretty good scripted shows on tv these days, other networks, pay channels, and stations like FX (think Sons of Anarchy) and even PBS (anyone heard of Downton Abbey?). While on the subject of Downton Abbey, it is on my ‘to start watching’ list and it’s my understanding that they have a full year between seasons. Plenty of time for me to catch up.  That’s a long break–but it’s an award-winning show.

In a world where ‘now’ means ‘now’ and the short attention spans of viewers, is ABC’s strategy friend or foe? I guess time–and the ratings–will tell.

(For those who watch Scandal–since Cyrus is my favorite character on the show–no, he is NOT the mole…he can’t be!)

The Golden Globes: What They Wore

I feel compelled to put out a disclaimer before I dive into this post. I know that  a lot, if not most, of Hollywood employs stylists. And I am a fan of some of them–the Rachel Zoe’s and Brad Goreski’s of the world are talented but I was an admirer of Phillip Bloch’s ‘work’ before being a stylist was fashionable? Remember the dress Halle Berry wore to the Oscars the year she won? Well, I do and it was Phillip Bloch who had a hand in it. Gorgeous! Anyway, hats off to the A-listers and the people who helped dress them because I can’t imagine how it must feel to have what you wore on one night totally dissected and over analyzed by the world. (But I’m going to do it anyway.)


Kerry Washington–My girl from Scandal! Kudos to her style on the show, because it did not come out at the Golden Globes. The dress, while nice, did nothing for her figure–totally unflattering, as was her hair and make up. It would’ve been better to chop off the bottom of the dress and have her wear the entire look to a party, not an awards show where Django Unchained took home quite a few statues.

70th Annual Golden Globe Awards - Arrivals

Halle Berry–Seriously, can I please age this well?!?! Oh wait, she’s NOT aging (which is amazing considering the drama that often surrounds her). She looked fabulous. Halle has made a habit of pushing the sophisticated/edgy envelope with the designers she wears. Her one shouldered, asymmetrical dress, showcased a body to die for. I ain’t mad at ya! But I think it would be better suited for the Grammy’s.


Anne Hathaway–A simple, white, pretty dress. I thought it washed her out a bit because of her alabaster skin. But overall, she looked very regal. The pixie haircut is truly working for her.


Kate Hudson–The black with the cut out and the gold, pretty, but entirely too old for her. (Much better suited to Goldie Hawn.) If anyone can embrace flowy inner hippie chic it’s Kate. (And Nicole Richie, who also did not display the bohemian style she has become famous for and instead went with a long-sleeved blue frock.) I’m noticing a trend with these two. No need to prove you’re mature women of the world, go with what works for you.

70th Annual Golden Globe Awards - Arrivals

Claire Danes–I still struggle with the whole Claire Danes/Billy Crudup/Mary Louise Parker scandal of ages ago. Hence, she looked fine.


J Lo–Her dress was a form fitting bunch of appliques. Her hair and make-up were done to perfection, she’s beautiful, no denying–but this was hard to love let alone like. (I’m sure many will disagree with me on that one.)


Lucy Liu–Apparently, she dressed for a Gone With the Wind garden party and inadvertently wound up at the Golden Globes instead.

There were a lot of blush and white dresses (translation, NO color) and plenty that fell into the coral family–one extreme to another. And everyone it seems wanted their hair pulled to the side.

I could go on and on and on… But let me move on to my best and worst dressed of the Golden Globes.

taylor-swift-golden-globes-2013-01132013-600x450Best: Taylor Swift. If you asked, I couldn’t begin to name a song by her, but from her hair, to her earrings, to the dress–sheer perfection. And she didn’t have some frilly, fringy, furry evening bag to throw everything off. Runner(s) Up: Jessica Alba and Heidi Klum


Worst: Sienna Miller. I have no idea what she has on. Honestly, the top looks like something I attempted to make in Home Ec back in the 80’s. Her hair is extreme. Her make-up is too nude. Bad. Bad. Bad. Runner(s)Up: Lucy Liu and Jessica Chastain

I have scoured the Web looking for the best red carpet photos and right now I have to go with MTV.

This is my first fashion post and getting the pictures to work was a challenge. I think I’ve found a method to the posting madness so hopefully I’m poised to post quickly going forward since awards season is upon us. Enjoy!